Like, there’s no irony

For some time now I’ve had a backup idea, a column-writing safety net of sorts. That is to say with a blank screen in front of me, a rapidly approaching deadline, and no subject on the horizon I’ve always had one in reserve. And today is the day I use it.

Peter Matthews

I don’t mind songs with crazy lyrics; songwriters have often conceived their compositions in variously altered mental states and the outpouring of consciousness can often be hard to decipher. David Bowie’s ‘Jean Genie’ for instance, ‘loves chimney stacks’ for no apparent reason other than a handy rhyme.

What I do object to is incorrect lyrics: Whether the error be grammatic, syntactic, or factual there is no excuse other than ignorance, and as a university lecturer once told me, that is no excuse at all.

Alanis Morissette, for example, considers ‘rain on your wedding day’ to be ironic. This is not ironic, it is simply unfortunate. I confess I have always found irony to be a slippery concept – it comes in many forms and can trip you up. The official meaning of irony is ‘the expression of one’s meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.’ Alanis goes on to list a further example; ‘a free ride when you’ve already paid’. Yup, she can have that one; it’s not a concept described ironically, more just a statement of the situation but it’s an ironic situation nonetheless – isn’t it? Perhaps a grey area.

Not so grey is Rod Stewart singing ‘holding up for prosperity for the whole damn world to see’. He simply got the wrong word – it should have been ‘posterity’. Although there is (I think) a delightful irony in that mistake, since the inarguable result of him singing the song ‘I Was only Joking’ was indeed prosperity.

Now for the big one: In the 1973 hit ‘Live and Let Die’ Paul McCartney sang ‘in this ever-changing world in which we live in’. This was reflected in the original sheet music for the song and is a clanger of epic proportions: At least one, if not two superfluous ‘ins’ depending on how you read it.

A more recent representation of this lyric is ‘if this ever-changing world in which we’re living’ which is perfectly fine. McCartney himself, in an interview with the Washington Post said he doesn’t really pay much attention to how he sings it and it could be either but the former seems ‘wronger but cuter’ which of course compounds the initial crime.

Fortunately none of this is important. The word ‘like’ is misused countless times a day by almost everyone with very little negative consequence, and I have just taken up a couple of your minutes for no good reason other than a temporary diversion from your day. I hope you don’t think it was a waste of time, and I hope your day continues well. Now I shall have to see about coming up with another backup column subject.

More Recent News

News … in brief

Nifty shades of Gray In charge of the telephone exchange starting late last century at the Waikato Times she was,  in many ways, the newspaper’s public voice. Now Hamilton’s Operatic Society is planning the ultimate…

Roundabout ruckus

25 July 2pm The gouged verge at the Shakespeare Street roundabout has been repaired and lawn seed reapplied. But it already appears as if a vehicle has gone over it. 25 July 5am Truckies say…

Adventists to celebrate at 50

Cambridge’s Seventh Day Adventist church members will mark their 50th anniversary on August 3. Harvey Gangadeen, pastor for the Cambridge, Tīrau and Matamata churches recounts the church’s history. The story of Cambridge Church began circa…

Bright spark Amy honoured

Former Cambridge student Amy FitzPatrick has been celebrated for her leadership skills. She was named outstanding leader of the year (site-based) at last week’s National Association of Women in Construction Awards. Her award celebrates women…